<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>New Cool Thang &#187; Atonement &amp; Soteriology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newcoolthang.com/index.php/category/theology/atonement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newcoolthang.com</link>
	<description>Mormon Musings by yer ol' pals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:58:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Failing Falling</title>
		<link>http://www.newcoolthang.com/index.php/2011/10/failing-falling/2907/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newcoolthang.com/index.php/2011/10/failing-falling/2907/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt W.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Atonement & Soteriology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plan of Salvation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcoolthang.com/?p=2907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“We believe that men will be punished for their own sins, and not for Adam&#8217;s transgression.” -2nd Article of Faith “All mankind, by the fall of Adam being cut off from the presence of the Lord, are considered as dead, both as to things temporal and to things spiritual” -Helaman 14:16 It is a common [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newcoolthang.com/index.php/2011/10/failing-falling/2907/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Atonement Soup Revisited</title>
		<link>http://www.newcoolthang.com/index.php/2010/09/atonement-soup-revisited/2424/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newcoolthang.com/index.php/2010/09/atonement-soup-revisited/2424/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt W.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Atonement & Soteriology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcoolthang.com/?p=2424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some time back, Kevin Barney ventured forth the opinion that the Church’s approach to atonement is a mix of many theories, especially pointing to how the hymns of the Church can be mapped to what Barney refers to as the four key theories of atonement. [1] I believe Barney is correct in his assertion that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newcoolthang.com/index.php/2010/09/atonement-soup-revisited/2424/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Response to Blake&#8217;s Critique of My Atonement Paper</title>
		<link>http://www.newcoolthang.com/index.php/2010/06/a-response-to-blakes-critique/2207/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newcoolthang.com/index.php/2010/06/a-response-to-blakes-critique/2207/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 08:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacob J</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Atonement & Soteriology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcoolthang.com/?p=2207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blake has a relatively new paper up on his site called &#8220;Atonement in Mormon Thought (a Response to Deidre Green Regarding the Compassion Theory of Atonement)&#8221;. As the title indicates, it is largely a response to a paper critiquing his compassion theory of atonement.&#8224; Before making his response to Deidre Green, Blake does a quick [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newcoolthang.com/index.php/2010/06/a-response-to-blakes-critique/2207/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another attempt at explaining the atonement.</title>
		<link>http://www.newcoolthang.com/index.php/2010/01/another-attempt-at-explaining-the-atonement/1827/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newcoolthang.com/index.php/2010/01/another-attempt-at-explaining-the-atonement/1827/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 07:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt W.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Atonement & Soteriology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ostler Reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcoolthang.com/?p=1827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post grew out of a need to explain my discomfort with the &#8220;Parable of the Bicycle&#8221;, as well as a complaint from a friend that too often the bloggernacle refers to other older posts and does not leave room for new conversations. Because I do not wish to be critical directly of the faith [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newcoolthang.com/index.php/2010/01/another-attempt-at-explaining-the-atonement/1827/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Atonement Algebra</title>
		<link>http://www.newcoolthang.com/index.php/2009/08/atonement-algebra/1260/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newcoolthang.com/index.php/2009/08/atonement-algebra/1260/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt W.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Atonement & Soteriology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcoolthang.com/?p=1260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some people say the most universal language is math. With that in mind, I was goofing around this morning, trying to explain the atonement with math. Hereâ€™s my first attempt: M = Me J = Jesus S = Achieving my exaltation N = the time Iâ€™ve existed (infinity) M^N &#60; S J &#60;&#62; S M^N [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newcoolthang.com/index.php/2009/08/atonement-algebra/1260/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Myth of Restitution</title>
		<link>http://www.newcoolthang.com/index.php/2009/07/the-myth-of-restitution/1149/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newcoolthang.com/index.php/2009/07/the-myth-of-restitution/1149/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 06:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacob J</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Atonement & Soteriology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcoolthang.com/?p=1149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Sorry&#8221; doesn&#8217;t put the Triscuit crackers in my stomach now, does it Carl? (Eric, Billy Madison) If restitution is required for true repentance to take place, then we are all screwed. Sure, there are some sins for which restitution can be made. Stolen stuff can be returned. A relationship can be restored. But, for the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newcoolthang.com/index.php/2009/07/the-myth-of-restitution/1149/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chapter 5 &#8211; Atonement</title>
		<link>http://www.newcoolthang.com/index.php/2009/05/chapter-5-atonement/1047/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newcoolthang.com/index.php/2009/05/chapter-5-atonement/1047/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 21:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kent (MC)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Atonement & Soteriology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plan of Salvation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcoolthang.com/?p=1047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Click here for previous posts in this series and why I&#8217;m writing this children&#8217;s book. Every living person is given the Light of Christ when they are born, which is also sometimes called our conscience. This light helps us know basic right from wrong. When we feel we should do something kind for someone else, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newcoolthang.com/index.php/2009/05/chapter-5-atonement/1047/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Atonement as Theodicy</title>
		<link>http://www.newcoolthang.com/index.php/2008/09/the-atonement-as-theodicy/559/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newcoolthang.com/index.php/2008/09/the-atonement-as-theodicy/559/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 03:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt W.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Atonement & Soteriology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcoolthang.com/index.php/2008/09/the-atonement-as-theodicy/559/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post was an experiment in whether concentrating on the issues in my previous post would enable me to better put forth a discussion of the atonement. Your input and thoughts are greatly appreciated. First to give context, I recently read a blog post about a &#8220;Reductio ad Hitlerum&#8221; film put on by BBC regarding [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newcoolthang.com/index.php/2008/09/the-atonement-as-theodicy/559/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>108</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why the Atonement is so hard to discuss. (Warning, this is all Meta)</title>
		<link>http://www.newcoolthang.com/index.php/2008/09/why-the-atonement-is-so-hard-to-discuss-warning-this-is-all-meta/555/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newcoolthang.com/index.php/2008/09/why-the-atonement-is-so-hard-to-discuss-warning-this-is-all-meta/555/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt W.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Atonement & Soteriology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcoolthang.com/index.php/2008/09/why-the-atonement-is-so-hard-to-discuss-warning-this-is-all-meta/555/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today I went back and read a few old posts, and a few things became apparent. 1.) I forget things. Thus every six months or so, I post the same posts over again and say the same things, in a slightly different way, forgetting that Geoff J or Blake or Jacob or somebody and I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newcoolthang.com/index.php/2008/09/why-the-atonement-is-so-hard-to-discuss-warning-this-is-all-meta/555/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Atonement, as defined by &#8220;Preach my Gospel&#8221; is not substitution.</title>
		<link>http://www.newcoolthang.com/index.php/2007/12/the-atonement-as-defined-by-preach-my-gospel-is-not-substitution/485/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newcoolthang.com/index.php/2007/12/the-atonement-as-defined-by-preach-my-gospel-is-not-substitution/485/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 20:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt W.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Atonement & Soteriology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcoolthang.com/index.php/2007/12/the-atonement-as-defined-by-%e2%80%9cpreach-my-gospel%e2%80%9d-is-not-substitution/485/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As it is the current tradition of the Church to publish the majority of itâ€™s texts online, The Church has now done so with Preach My Gospel, the current Guide to Missionary Work in the Church. As this Manual will shape the thoughts and feelings of missionaries and converts for years to come, and thus, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newcoolthang.com/index.php/2007/12/the-atonement-as-defined-by-preach-my-gospel-is-not-substitution/485/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Requested URI is rejected)
Database Caching 1/48 queries in 0.054 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 495/593 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.newcoolthang.com @ 2012-02-10 03:32:34 -->
