Comments on: The “Reductio ad Korihorem” Rule

By: Geoff J

Geoff J — Sat, 15 Nov 2008 15:14:38 +0000

Which blog is it Stephen? Do you have the URL?

By: Stephen Robinson

Stephen Robinson — Sat, 15 Nov 2008 11:07:21 +0000

Korihor’s back, and this time he’s got a blog.

By: Hal

Hal — Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:27:24 +0000

In fact, Nehor seemed to have a more long lasting influence than any other of the anti-Christs. Plus, his name almost rhymes with Maher – if you pronounce it incorrectly – which is an added plus.

By: clark

clark — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 15:19:18 +0000

Nehor is so underappreciated as anti-Christs go…

By: Eric Nielson

Eric Nielson — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:49:16 +0000

I agree. There is often to much exaggerated, hyperbolic, name calling that goes on. And eventually one will lose credibility if they continue.

By: meems

meems — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 17:43:21 +0000

Call me MISTER Korihor.

By: The Right Trousers

The Right Trousers — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 11:03:39 +0000

I believe that everything is a crime, so you’re ALL Korihors to me.

By: Ronan

Ronan — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 09:18:28 +0000

I can get behind this. I like me some rules.

By: Steve Evans

Steve Evans — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 04:13:17 +0000

Let’s face it, this is 10000x more likely to come up in the context of taxation.

By: Matt W.

Matt W. — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 02:16:15 +0000

Nitsav: That’s very Korihor like of you, to ask a question. Unless Dan Vogel has been struck dumb and mute by God, it’s probably still an unwise thing to do.